Pacem in Terrisby sam enderby |
A few years after my grandfather died my mother had his copy of the "Tanach" rebound by a Moroccan Muslim from Queens (NY!).
My mom thought that her father would have enjoyed such an ecumenical
gesture for we were typical liberals after- all, who tried to always
mind what zayde would do and say. He wasn't a railroad man for nothing.
Anyway, upon its return the bookbinder made sure to mention that there
was an old newspaper clipping still placed in my grandfather's book. He
had left it where he found it. The article as I recall was an account of
the funeral of Pope John XXIII and the lead or
headline stated that the good Pope had requested a particular passage
from "the Jewish Bible" to be read -the clipping is long vanished but I
believe the passage was from the Book Of Isaiah and I
wouldn't be surprised if it included the line about beating swords into
plowshares. My grandfather was so taken by this that he saved the
article and placed it in his Tanach in the pages where the verse was
located ( so the next time you see a sign reading "Isaiah 2.4" being
held up at a football game just think of my grandfather). Interestingly,
for me only, on the reverse side of the article was a story that was
filed by a "journalism 101" professor I once had ( its always a small
world here at the jm). My grandfather came from a religious family but
he himself was not a religious man tho' he was widely read in the "holy"
books and he always maintained an inquisitiveness and a guarded posture
toward the world. Wary, always. I would come to think of this later but
I always thought he lived where he lived - and by extension my mom and
my father and me- in a rather goyishe (forgive my slanderous idiomatic
usage) section of Queens, NY because he wanted to test (God). That and
to be within walking
distance of Sunnyside Yards, where the Pennsylvania Railroad-
at one time- had its offices. At any rate he was rather moved by the
Pope's request because- lets face it- Popes as a group weren't shall we
say so nice to the Jews which pleased a lot of people living in certain
parts of Queens at the time, but we can discuss this later. But this
Pope-John XXIII- not only impressed my grandfather but succeeded in
making a lot of Catholics angry when he convened what is called the Second Vatican Council
and this convocation had the chutzpah to state as official church
doctrine that All Jews or at least Most Jews were not and are not
responsible for the death of Jesus (see: Nostra Aetate). After almost
two thousand years this was some gantseh megilah. I can't help it but I
always think of the old Lenny Bruce bit about the Jews
being "christkillers" accusation and the note from his cousin (Morty?)
found in the basement. Looking back with a squinting gaze it was a scary
time - the big Vatican hoo-hah started around the time of that Cuban Missile Crisis
and ended around the first large military escalation in Vietnam. By the
time it ended Pope John XXIII had died. His death of complications from
cancer came less than 6 months before the death of President John F. Kennedy
of complications from some well-placed bullets along a busy Dallas
intersection. Even though the Pope was 81 and the President 46 (!) at
the time of their respective deaths a case could probably be made that
something almost ethereally good went away from our world then not to
return - at least not yet. Fifty years later with the Cold War behind
us, with the advances in science and technology and medicine, with a
newly resolved civil and human rights agenda, with the U.S.A. still at
the apex of its powers what, if anything, has changed - about us? About
our world? What have we learned - if anything? Well, we've learned how
to do a lot of stuff except what we should have been doing all along-
how to be with one another. If this is starting to sound a little
schmaltzy well it may have to do with this:
About
two months before he died Pope John XXIII issued what is now a famous
"papal encyclical", PACEM IN TERRIS (Peace On Earth). Famous, yes, but
seldom read now and sadly- for these past 50 years, taken to heart. It
was addressed not only to Catholics (in Queens and around the world) but
to all men (and women, we assume) of goodwill. Among many things it
stated: "conflicts should be resolved not by arms but by negotiation" -
Its
taken us a little while to grasp this; that "every man (and we're
making a moral leap here-and woman) has the right to life, to bodily
integrity, and to the means which are suitable for the proper
development of life-these are primarily FOOD, CLOTHING, SHELTER, REST
(!), MEDICAL CARE and finally the NECESSARY SOCIAL SERVICES. Therefore
a human being also has the right to security in cases of sickness,
inability to work, widowhood, old age, unemployment, or in any other
case in which he is deprived of the means of subsistence through no
fault of his own." - Or just the things left out of Paul Ryan's budget.
But wait, there's more and then we'll dismiss. The Pope also said: "
Furthermore- and this must be specially emphasized- the worker has a
right to a wage determined according to criterions of justice, and
sufficient, therefore, in proportion to the available resources, to give
the worker and his family a standard of living in keeping with the
dignity of the human person." So, uh, Pope XXIII was no Republican.
No comments:
Post a Comment
The Joyful Moocher welcomes and encourages all comments.